<![CDATA[Three-Dollar Kit

<![CDATA[Three-Dollar Kit - Blog]]>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:09:13 +1000Weebly<![CDATA[Anjali's intuition is kinda shitty]]>Sat, 09 May 2026 04:53:46 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/anjalis-intuition-is-kinda-shitty

Anjali is many things, but correct about Charlie Wiser she never is. In 2025, through a mutual friend, I learned that the following heinous accusations she leveled against me since 2022 were based on assumptions, not evidence. (Obviously I already knew there was no evidence since the accusations were all false.)

That I contacted her ex-husband in 2021 and told him she was a nutty drug addict and unfit mother, causing him to cancel their son's Christmas visit
That I drove someone to suicide
That I said her hosts ("Wayne and Trisha") sexually assaulted her during her 2018 Amazing Alien Tunnel Adventure.

In March 2026 when I tweeted about an unrelated court case in which a woman admitted to defaming someone based on her intuition, and likened it to what Anjali did to me, Anjali responded with:

"Once again, Charlie Wiser is purposefully lying to their followers. Nothing I have stated about this anonymous account has ever been based on "intuition." It is incorrect that I ever said or claimed that any of it was based on intuition.
Charlie Wiser is an obsessive wise-ass, an harassing troll with little wisdom who hides like a coward behind their anonymity."

Basing one's conclusions on assumptions and feelings instead of evidence is called... intuition. In this case, very bad intuition. Yet here Anjali denies using intuition in regards to anything she's said about me. Nor does she take accountability for inventing and/or spreading the above heinous rumors about me, regardless of whether intuition was involved.

Side note: Anjali's constant refrain that I'm anonymous is hypocritical. She was anonymous on Reddit for years before coming out in Mar 2021, and then remained anonymous for 5 months after coming out. She only revealed her name during the press conference Aug 2021.

Another side note: Despite having regular access to a higher being with telepathic and teleportation powers (Lavvy the giant lavender mantis with no hands), Anjali never thought to ask him if her intuition was correct. Or she did and he lied. What a fucked up situation that would be.

Bonus side note: Anjali also knows I'm a woman, and even if she didn't know that, she knows my preferred pronouns. Which makes her a bigot for misgendering me as well as a liar.

Let's take a closer look at the three claims Anjali made about me, based on her intuition.

Claim: That I contacted Anjali's ex-husband in 2021 and said mean things about her

Anjali told the property owners this lie in Sep 2023 to manipulate them into turning against me, right after her failed attempt to get back on their property by claiming Brandon Fugal's team wanted to visit and take drugs to meet the beings, which I examined here: Anjali's fantasy collab with Brandon Fugal.

The property owners bit back, not caring about her lies. When I found out about this claim a few months later, I contacted (for the first time) Anjali's ex to ask him why she'd said this. He never replied, and was under no obligation to reply, of course. I also chatted with Anjali's more recent ex, Max, who theorized that Anjali may have heard this either from her ex-husband or via her adult daughter. I wrote about these possibilities, including how Anjali's claims evolved to the point where she just invented crap when it came time to manipulate the property owners: Who’s the weakest link? (Spoiler: it’s Anjali).

In 2025, via a mutual friend, Anjali clarified that this claim had nothing to do with her daughter (which I'd already concluded, see above). She said several people called her ex after her press conference and she'd assumed I was one of them. In other words, she made it up, i.e. her intuition told her it was me, based on no evidence, and then she spread the lie as factual.

Note: I've never spontaneously called anyone regarding anything ufology-related. I've done a few internet-based calls (Discord, Zoom, Messenger) over the years but never over the phone. I don't even have an international plan.

Bonus note: Anjali told her hosts in the same message she could attack me publicly with this information but that would only make me "get crueler". In Anjali's warped mind, me defending myself against her lies is being "cruel".

CLAIM: That I drove someone to suicide

For reasons unknown, Anjali volunteered to me in an email that she'd spread the rumor I drove someone (an experiencer) to suicide, and that she had screenshots about the matter. She didn't tell me the name of the person, send the allegedly bullying screenshots, or provide anything else resembling evidence. She said she "could damn near believe it" because... uh, because sometimes people are toxic online.

In other words, her intuition told her I was probably guilty.

I asked around to see if anyone knew of an experiencer who'd taken his life, so I could look back on any interactions I'd had with him. Nobody knew anything about a male suicide victim in the community. (I did learn only about a female victim I'd never heard of or interacted with to my knowledge.)

Then via our mutual friend, Anjali revealed last year that this was all nothing to do with me, after all. Someone had told her I was involved, but when she looked into it she discovered the "CW" referred to was actually the CW Network where this person had worked.

Despite learning the truth, Anjali never told me she was wrong or apologized for spreading the rumor. She apparently preferred to live with the pleasure of believing I thought I'd driven someone to suicide. This is what evil people do.

CLAIM: That I said her hosts sexually assaulted her

The first I heard of this was when "Trisha" sent me all Anjali's communications with them, right after she and "Wayne" (the property owners) came forward to me in Feb 2022 to reveal Anjali had been high as a kite during her 2018 visit (which is why, it seems, days or weeks or years later, her imagination filled in her memory blanks with aliens). Shortly after, Anjali released the same communications - thus making her accusations against me public.

Anjali felt the need to smear my name because she hoped to manipulate the property owners into joining her lawsuit against me. She told them Charlie Wiser "suggested that when I went to your home, you drugged me, led me into a cave and took sexual advantage of me, and filmed it all." And that Charlie "deleted many of her nasty love tunnel tweets that contained the references to drugging me, taking advantage of me in a tunnel, filming it."

Anjali's messages to her hosts, Feb 2022

This once again is a story that has evolved in Anjali's delusional mind as the need arose. She admitted to our mutual friend in 2025 that the offending item was merely a graphic (Max said it was on Reddit, not Twitter) depicting her having an alien orgy in a tunnel. Nobody seems to have screenshotted the post or the poster's name.

I have no alt accounts in the ufology space, have never created such a graphic, and never posted that one (if it even existed).

So, it turns out this was not a suggestion of sexual assault. Not a string of "love tunnel" tweets. Not anything about drugging or filming. Just an alien orgy graphic.

Where there was speculation about nonconsensual drugging, assault, and filming, was in the Mystery Den Discord after Anjali's press conference. I collected some of the comments, which Anjali's addled brain has apparently attributed to yours truly:

I replied on Discord and also tweeted, multiple times, that I didn't think that could be true:

Despite this, Anjali decided, based on her intuition, that I made the graphic and that I speculated about her hosts assaulting her. She even doubled down in October 2023, in response to a tweet where I both linked to a thread that showed the above evidence, and repeated the evidence in further replies. And then she had the gall to tell our mutual friend in 2025 that she'd never seen my defenses of her claim.

Anjali doubling down on her disgusting allegation, and ignoring my evidence that proves her wrong

Side note: The other people who speculated about Anjali being assaulted were: the friend who picked her up that night, Anjali herself on Jimmy Church, and her own daughter who helped her check her body for signs of assault:

If not intuition, then what?

Anjali recently denied ever using intuition in her claims about me. Which leads me to ask: if not intuition, then what? Certainly not evidence, since she has none. So, unless Lavvy deceived her, what does that leave?

It leaves bald-faced lying. Pure fabrication. And the evidence shows she used those fabrications to attempt to manipulate others against me.

The perils of intuition

One last note: In May 2024, another mutual friend noticed that Anjali had started following the Twitter accounts of three Australian female writers and editors, all unrelated to ufology. It seemed she was attempting a jump scare on the real Charlie Wiser, i.e. that she thought one of those accounts might be my real name. She later referred to me by one of those names in an email, confirming this theory. (You see how evidence works, Anjali?)

And now, two years later, a couple of Australian UFO researchers are publicly and repeatedly calling me by that same person's name. Based on zero evidence. Just a rumor that Anjali involved herself in.

Anjali has, at various times, decided on at least half a dozen different people as candidates for Charlie Wiser. She even announced she was going to sue one of them "for transparency" because he was "playing both sides" of ufology as a DC lobbyist and skeptic, which would've resulted in doxing him. She has never admitted she was wrong about any of those guesses, or taken back the ones she made publicly.

The writer currently at the top of her list is a person with almost nothing in common with me other than her approximate age, her sex, state of residence, and general occupation. Anjali quite literally sifted through a state of 7 million people to set her sights on a specific middle-aged woman writer, and decided that it's me. And now the infection has spread to a couple of obsessive misogynist men the point that a very real, very random person is on the verge of being doxed as Charlie Wiser based on... Anjali's intuition.

]]><![CDATA[Anjali's drug-seeking behavior]]>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:16:15 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/anjalis-drug-seeking-behavior

Today, Anjali denied my characterisation of her drug-seeking behavior, and mentioned other "foul" and "twisted" accusations. In this post I'll list, with evidence, several instances of Anjali attempting to get back onto the property where she had her 2018 experience in the hope of taking drugs.

Before we start, let's remember that in 2022 Anjali released text messages where she told her hosts that I'd accused them of sexual assaulting her. Later, she told them that in 2021 I'd interfered with her custody issue. She also admitted passing along the rumor (which she found plausible) that I drove someone to suicide. This is all categorically untrue, and these three accusations are among the most foul and twisted things someone can accuse another person of. Just saying.

That time Anjali took RSO and lied about it
When Anjali told us in March 2021 that she was taken by "Wayne [Bryan] and Trisha" to meet aliens in their backyard tunnel in January 2018, she did not mention one crucial detail: that she was "fucked up" (according to an eyewitness) on Rick Simpson oil, a highly potent cannabis oil. Anjali lied (repeatedly) that she had no drugs in her system that day. She wanted everyone to believe she was sober and clear-headed, and had perfect recall.

Bryan used RSO for his cancer treatment and felt it could help Anjali with her various chronic conditions. Indeed, after reconnecting with the couple in 2021, she told them she felt better for weeks (see below).

So, here I present the evidence of her drug-seeking behavior based on her own words - messages she sent to the couple that "Trisha" has shared with me over the years. In summary, Anjali has repeatedly attempted to get back onto the property... and for some reason these efforts always include the expectation of drugs.

But cannabis is not a drug!
Let's address this one up front. When confronted by Steven Cambian on Truthseekers with her ongoing lie about having no drugs in her system during her tunnel adventure in 2018, Anjali's response was that she doesn't consider cannabis a drug:

"When you asked me if I was on any drugs, I said no. I don’t take drugs. When you asked me if I was on any psychedelics, I said no. I don’t take psychedelics. I never have denied that I was on any kind of prescription medications." [Anjali on Truthseekers, Mar 13, 2022, referencing her previous appearance on his show in Sep 2021]

But Anjali invented that first question. Cambian hadn't asked if she was on any drugs. (He did ask if she'd ever done a hallucinogenic drug.) Plenty of people had asked her on social media if she'd taken drugs that day, and she always answered no.

Here again she redefines cannabis to be not-a-drug, in order to explain why she'd denied taking drugs:

"[T]he question that was posed to me on that show was: “Were you on drugs?” okay. And I don't consider cannabis to be drugs... I'm thinking like heroin fentanyl, opioid use". [Anjali interview, Oct 10, 2024]

This is a ridiculous explanation of her lie, in context. People were clearly asking her if she'd taken anything that might have affected her perception. Cannabis is a psychoactive drug. THC is the psychoactive ingredient. RSO is notoriously high in THC content (60-90% compared to 15-25% in cannabis flower). Anjali had never taken this drug before. Witnesses describe her as "fucked up" and acting bizarrely. Her daughter was so concerned that afternoon that she sent an ambulance for a wellness check.

In November 2021, Anjali announced her expedition to the property was postponed but that she was looking for another way into the mountain base. The owners, thoroughly fed up with her circus, threatened to tell everyone she was high that day. Only then did Anjali finally admit publicly to taking medical cannabis.

Bryan threatens to reveal that Anjali was high during her Jan 2018 experience

To take control of the narrative, 3 days later Anjali publicly admits to taking cannabis

She repeated this a few times including this Tweet in Jan 2022, when she said she'd taken "medical cannabis resin for which I had a CA med card".

This misleading framing gave the impression that (1) she had bought Rx cannabis resin from a dispensary, and (2) the cannabis was medical but not recreational, i.e. higher in CBD rather than THC. Anjali also insisted she had perfect recall of the day's events, which suggests she believes she is immune to the psychoactive effects of THC.

As we found out when the property owners contacted me in late February 2022, Anjali did not buy medical cannabis using her Rx card. She took homemade RSO from a stranger.

Not only did Anjali not admit to taking cannabis until 8 months after she entered the community, she then lied again and claimed she had always admitted to taking cannabis: "I was always clear that I had cannabis in my system." [Anjali interview, Oct 10, 2024]

Lies upon lies.

Note: I personally have no issues whatsoever with cannabis. It's a proven godsend in addressing many symptoms. I also have no issues with Anjali trying RSO for her symptoms. My issue is with her lying about it, in order to avoid wrecking her credibility. If she'd said from the start that she'd taken RSO, nobody would've taken her alien story seriously. So she left that part out. She manipulated her audience with a lie.

Also, I am not claiming that Anjali hallucinated her experience while high on RSO. She has provable memory holes and perceptual distortions from that day. The other witnesses say she never mentioned the aliens she claims she'd just met. The most likely explanation, supported by the evidence, is that meditation and reflection over the next few days, weeks, and years, filled her hazy memory gaps with the alien story.

Loved the drugs, please send more!
Anjali told us that during her "6 hours" in the alien base (actually 90 minutes wandering around the backyard, according to the witnesses and the verified 911 ambulance call time), a giant mantid healed her in a magic white light.

That's what she told us. But in April 2024 she admitted to the property owners that it might just have been the RSO that made her feel better. She wanted them to mail her some more. This is a federal offense (and they did not do it). She even explained how to pack it... and gave them her (adult) child's address.

How desperate for drugs would you have to be, to involve your own child in a federal crime?

Fame, fortune, and more drugs!
In August 2023 Anjali reconnected with Bryan with a tempting offer. She claimed that the "team associated with Brandon Fugal's Beyond Skinwalker Ranch" were interested in investigating the property. Anjali shamelessly played up this interest as though she'd had extensive personal correspondence with the team, suggesting there might be money involved and that she'd been given password-protected access to the site. However, Brandon Fugal told me this was just a form response to any inquiries to the show.

Anjali could've stopped there, but no. She told them the team was "willing to ingest substances to reach the beings." Again, Fugal (a Mormon) categorically denied to me that anyone associated with his show would do such a thing.

Fugal correspondence with me after I alerted him to Anjali's claim his team wanted to investigate the property and take drugs

Anjali told a bald-faced lie, according to Fugal. But why?

Because she wanted to let Bryan know that his visitors - including herself - would be expecting RSO on the menu.

If Bryan had fallen for it, and given Fugal's team weren't actually interested in that property in the slightest, Anjali's next step would probably be to suggest a preliminary visit alone, to ingest that substance and meet her aliens again. This sequence of events seems even more plausible when you recall that in 2021 Anjali pretended Bigelow was interested in buying their property, but that she needed to visit first with Whitley Strieber to get evidence of the aliens.

Not done with her lies, Anjali called me a liar when I reported on these Fugal messages 9 months later. When I posted the evidence, she offered no explanation for her drug-seeking manipulations. Her only comment was that she'd forgotten about sending the messages.

It sure is hard for a compulsive liar to keep up with their lies.

Drugs? Success at last!
In March 2023, Anjali announced she'd partnered with a Hollywood production company for her forthcoming podcast. At that time, Bryan's property and construction business were on the market. As soon as Anjali found out, she told him that her podcast producers were "potential buyers". She wanted to bring them to visit the property... and, of course, to take RSO.

Despite repeated requests from Bryan, the producers never provided proof of funds. Instead, Anjali convinced the couple to sign NDAs (which she has since invalidated) and the visit took place in May 2024.

From Bryan's wife's description to me along with messages between the couple and Anjali: the producers flew Anjali to California and drove her to the property where Anjali's drug-seeking behavior was finally rewarded: everyone took RSO. Bryan's wife fed them her famous quinoa salad. They all went outside to the rockface where Anjali claimed the alien tunnel opening used to be. (This is actually just a space under the patio where years ago Bryan hacked out a small alcove.) Anjali has previously said such tunnels are hidden by holograms. Everyone sat around for a while waiting for the hologram to reveal the tunnel entrance and for aliens to appear. Nothing happened.

Anjali and the two producers had planned to camp there for the night, but one of the producers suddenly had to return to Los Angeles immediately. One might conclude they'd had enough of this crazy lady. They drove Anjali back to the airport and her podcast has never seen the light of day.

Bryan was left with the feeling that Anjali had overstated the producers' interest in, and ability to purchase, the property: "[Y]ou played me and I fell for it." Stacey was disgusted that Anjali had manipulated an autistic man.

Bryan's message to Anjali after the visit, May 20, 2024

Bryan's tweet the following year, referring to the quinoa salad

Denials don't cut it
Not including Anjali's initial RSO ingestion that started the ball rolling, I've catalogued with evidence three times where Anjali exhibited drug-seeking behavior. I don't care that she was seeking drugs. I do care about the lies and manipulations she employed in the process of doing so.

And if Anjali is going to deny her drug-seeking behavior by subtweeting me, you can be sure I'll write a blog post cataloguing the evidence that she exhibited it.

]]><![CDATA[Ross Coulthart: Adding Bunk to Ufology]]>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:12:49 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/ross-coulthart-adding-bunk-to-ufology

Bryce Zabel released on his YouTube channel Stellar Productions the video of his and Ross Coulthart's talk at Contact in the Desert (June 2025). There was nothing stellar about their retelling of the Westall case. Coulthart called this 1966 Australian school sighting "one of the foundation myths of Ross Coulthart’s conversion to the fact that the UFO phenomenon is real" [Howard Hughes The Unexplained, Mar 22, 2022] yet he doesn't seem too familiar with it.

Fake facts

Coulthart made several exaggerations and errors in discussing Westall. Let's look at them one by one, to demonstrate how he added bunk to this story - bunk that the audience probably took as facts of the case.

1. Invent a new testimony

Coulthart: "There's a science teacher called Andrew Greenwood standing with them watching the kids as they play and he looks up along with all the other kids and they all start screaming because there are either two or perhaps three elliptical metal discs hovering in the air just above the kids and Andrew is adamant that what he saw were disc-shaped objects."

As anyone with even a passing interest in this case knows, Greenwood was inside teaching his science class when a student rushed in yelling about a flying saucer.

He made the class wait until the recess bell before going outside, which was several minutes after the UFO was first seen. He was quite clear in his 1967 interview with James McDonald that he missed the entire first half of the sighting. He was not outside when the UFO was first seen.

First thing I heard was - I was teaching and most unusual for another child to just run into the classroom without warning. That’s what happened. A girl raced in and said “Mr Greenwood, quick, quick, flying saucer outside,” etc. And I got rid of her because I wasn’t going to leave my class or anything...
She left and it was about recess, I suppose 5, 10 minutes later, and I thought, I’ll wander out and have a look.
- Andrew Greenwood to James McDonald, July 1967

What Greenwood saw was so high in the sky and so indistinct that it took him some time to find it in the sky. He told the Dandenong Journal (1966) it was a "beam of light", and he told McDonald it was cigar-shaped and a quarter-mile away at the closest. Certainly he was not "adamant" he saw disc-shaped objects. He saw one object and it was never disc-shaped - he merely speculated it might have been a disc edge-on:

It took me a while to see it - grey against the - coming up to Autumn - blue-grey sky. I couldn’t see it immediately. Everyone saying, “It’s there, are you blind?” I finally picked up what they were looking at...
Now it was just at any stage to me cigar-shaped, cylindrical cigar-shaped except on occasions it appeared to bulge in the middle... Hold a plate on edge and... you can see the bulge in the middle, that type of effect. I can’t say that’s what was happening of course, but that’s what it appeared to be...
Half a mile, that would be when it was at its furthest distance from us. The closest it came would’ve been I suppose half that distance.
- Andrew Greenwood to James McDonald, July 1967

As I wrote about in my Westall case analysis, it's likely the first half of the sighting, which Greenwood saw none of, was a deflating Hibal scientific balloon that went down behind trees; and the second half of the sighting was a light plane dragging a drogue (wind sock) for target practice along with planes chasing it. Again, Greenwood did not see the first half of the event (the balloon that went down behind the trees). He assumed he was looking at the same object as the kids saw earlier, but his description of its shape and movement were completely different from their testimony.

Mr Greenwood first saw the object when it rose into the air from behind pine trees near the school. After about 20 minutes (at about the end of morning recess) Mr Greenwood looked away and when he looked back it had disappeared.
- Dandenong Journal, Apr 21, 1966

2. Add standard UFO tropes

Coulthart's next claim where he pulls info out of nowhere to make it conform better to the "standard" UFO case:

Coulthart: "[Greenwood] was quoted in the media, and the evening after the quote appeared in the press he told me how there was a knock on his door late at night. And I think it was one man was in uniform and the other was in a black suit and they said to him: if he kept on repeating this story they would make sure he never worked as a teacher again."

This "man in black" is entirely invented by Coulthart. Greenwood said the man wore plain clothes. Coulthart also added the creepy embellishment "late at night".

Two weeks later, a knock on the door and when I answered it there were two people there, one in plain clothes, and then the other one senior Air Force.
- Greenwood to Coulthart, Out of this World, 7News Spotlight, Aug 21, 2022

3. Toss logic aside

There's a huge problem with Greenwood's recollection of these threatening visitors - to the extent that I don't think there were any visitors, or if there were, he was not scared into silence.

Coulthart: "...60 years later to have the courage to speak about something that he'd been threatened not to talk about all those decades ago, it was a huge decision for him to go public."

Coulthart wants us to think he was bullied into silence, yet Greenwood did speak about it, in great detail and without any fear - twice. And never mentioned any visit from officials threatening him not to.

After APRO published its May-Jun '66 issue, Greenwood spoke to UFO enthusiast James Kibel (the Balwyn Bell hoaxer) who relayed a detailed eyewitness account to James McDonald in an audio letter. Notably, Greenwood told Kibel it wasn't the military who shut down talk of the incident but the headmaster:

[Greenwood] read this report in the APRO Bulletin and said that most of the so-called facts mentioned in it were incorrect. There was no question of officials quashing the sighting, as it was put by APRO. The person behind the sort of close-down on this particular sighting was the headmaster, who was quite scared or disturbed by the whole thing. He refused to go outside into the school yard, even when told the object was in the sky. When the Air Force contacted the headmaster, he told them - and his exact words which were, “Go and jump in the lake.”
- Kibel to McDonald, after the May-Jun '66 APRO Bulletin came out

In 1967 when McDonald visited Australia (and researched UFOs on his own time) he interviewed Greenwood - who again made no mention of being told never to talk about it, and no mention of being visited by the authorities even when given the perfect opening to do so:

McDonald: Then the Air Force came and did he [headmaster] reiterate these kinds of things?
Greenwood: Not to the school, not to the school. He just told me that an Air Force officer had been out to the school and I was teaching at the time and he told them that he wasn’t going to interrupt my class so that I could speak to them.
- Greenwood to McDonald, Jun 28, 1967

Greenwood would surely have added here that the Air Force came to his house, since they weren't permitted to talk to him at school, if indeed they had visited him. But he says nothing through the entire interview.

Earlier in the interview, Greenwood mentions the Air Force did come to the school but (as he also told Kibel) it was the headmaster who quashed the story when he called a special assembly. And note it was the headmaster who insinuated Greenwood was a drunk - apparently in public, which must have been mortifying:

Greenwood: [The headmaster] of his own volition, I know he had a special assembly at lunch time because lots of the children were back late from leaping the fence, going to look for it, and told them what a whole lot of rot the whole thing had been and some people will believe anything, words to this effect.
McDonald: Was the Air Force in before that recess?
Greenwood: Oh no no, they didn't come for two or three days. [This cannot be true, as the school broke up for Easter]
McDonald: So that couldn’t be blamed on the Air Force.
Greenwood: Oh no, no, I’m saying he had a special assembly at lunch time... where he spoke about this particular incident.
McDonald: Said it was a lot of nonsense?
Greenwood: Yes. I was accused of suffering from the effects of a hangover and a few things, which I wasn’t.
- Greenwood to McDonald, Jun 28, 1967

Given that Greenwood didn't mention this visit by the Air Force, or any pressure from them to stay quiet, in 1966 or in 1967, it's quite possible his memory invented such a visit in the intervening years based on "typical" UFO stories mashed up with the headmaster's slanderous accusation.

4. Mix n' match the witnesses

Coulthart's next mangling of the Westall story comes when he melds the stories of two witnesses whom he himself interviewed!

Coulthart: “There was a conspiracy theory that I was able to debunk about Westall. There's always been this story that there was one little girl who got really close to the craft and that she disappeared the day after she touched, or not touched, went very very close to the craft. I recently found her and interviewed her, and her parents had just moved schools, you know, there was no conspiracy theory. She'd just left the school and there was this massive conspiracy theory and it's been there for probably 50-60 years that she'd been whisked away by dark men in black. But she did describe walking up to and holding her hand up and feeling the heat, the radiant heat from this solid metal hovering object that was probably no more than 10 or 11 feet from her, and it's a chilling story…”

Firstly, it was not Coulthart who "found" Tanya or who debunked this conspiracy theory, so I don't know why he's taking credit. It was filmmaker Rosie Jones (Westall '66 documentary) who found her, back in 2011 according to Shane Ryan (the researcher featured in the documentary) who reported to the Westall Yahoo Group that she was "alive and well".

In 2016 Shane again reported that Rosie had talked to Tanya (this was well before Coulthart was even interested in UFOs):

[Tanya] saw the flying saucers in the sky and recalls being interviewed by two men, who she thought were police.
- Shane Ryan, Westall Flying Saucer Incident Facebook Group, Apr 12, 2016

When Coulthart interviewed Tanya for his Secrets of the UFOs documentary in 2021, she described the UFO as "a shiny two-storey disc." That's it. That's all. She didn't say she saw it on the ground because that wasn't her story - it was Terry's story.

Tanya reports being questioned at school for 15 minutes by "two gentlemen" (she told Rosie Jones they were police, i.e. Australian, but now she contradicts herself and says - under Coulthart's prompting - that they were American). Note that while it's Terry who claims she got close enough to the UFO to feel its heat, it was two other girls who jumped the fence that day - Tanya and another witness Jacquie - who were interviewed by the authorities. Terry has never claimed this.

5. Ignore witness inconsistencies

Terry's sensational story was unknown until the 2010 documentary Westall '66. No other students have ever said that she told this story at the time. And her story has changed repeatedly since 2010, both in terms of Tanya's involvement (playing into the conspiracy that she was hysterical and vanished) and her own increasingly amazing interactions with the UFO - read my timeline of her statements.

6. Let your buddy spout more nonsense

Finally, Coulthart's co-host for this talk was Bryce Zabel who adds his own misleading bunk to the case:

Zabel: "I’ve seen the images from that case, the Westall case. And the craft that the children drew, and even I believe the teachers drew, looks very similar to the craft that John Lennon saw in 1974 in New York City. They look like identical to me."

No teachers drew anything from that sighting. There is only one adult witness who has given any testimony - Andrew Greenwood - who never drew it. There are only two contemporaneous sketches of the UFO, from the child witnesses Joy and Marilyn. Here are their drawings compared to John Lennon's. Identical!

Joy's drawing (from her sighting report), 1966

Marilyn's drawing (for the Dandenong Journal), 1966

John Lennon's drawing of his 1974 UFO sighting in Manhattan, “Walls and Bridges” album

Why does it matter?

Coulthart was speaking at a UFO conference where the audience view him as an authority on the subject. Yet he can barely speak a sentence about this case without exaggerating or introducing an outright falsehood.

Would his audience bother fact-checking? He's an award-winning investigative journalist! They trust him to present the truth.

Coulthart has the platform - he should use it responsibly. He makes money from ufology - he should be careful with the facts when talking to ufology enthusiasts who believe in him.

And let's not forget: Coulthart has the nerve to call skeptics "bleating debunkers" when he's the one adding bunk to ufology.

]]><![CDATA[Anjali's fantasy collab with Brandon Fugal]]>Sun, 18 May 2025 00:45:28 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/anjalis-fantasy-collab-with-brandon-fugal

I've exposed countless lies that Anjali (Angelia Schultz) has been telling since 2021, including lies to the property owners where she had her experience in 2018, lies to the public, and lies about me. I became aware of the following bizarre lie in early 2024. When I exposed it, Anjali called me the liar and later absolved herself of responsibility for the lie by saying... she forgot telling it.

Let's dive in.

The text screenshots reproduced here are the entirety of a conversation Anjali had with Bryan (property owner) in August to September 2023.

A brief history

Anjali visits a property in the Mojave high desert in 2018, then in March 2021 writes a post on Reddit saying the property owner Bryan took her to meet aliens in a tunnel that day. She holds a press conference in August announcing an expedition to the property to bring back "irrefutable evidence" of these aliens, although she does not have permission from the owners. Their relationship deteriorates and she "postpones" the expedition in November. A few days later she announces the end of the world in an apocalypse, due in 2027.

In February 2022 the property owners contact me to explain their side of the story: that day in 2018, they invited Anjali home to chill after taking Rick Simpson oil (RSO, which Bryan used as part of his healing). Anjali was very stoned and acting so bizarrely that after communicating with her concerned daughter, the daughter sent an ambulance to the address for a welfare check.

Bryan told Anjali in 2021, and tells me in 2022, that he has never dug such a tunnel and does not have the skills or money to do so. He denies telling Anjali he would take her to meet aliens in that non-existent tunnel. The first they knew of her story is during a videocall the day before her presser, where Anjali tells him he certainly did dug a tunnel, he does have aliens on his property, and it's time for him to remember.

Mormon madness

Anjali reconnects with the property owners on Aug 15, 2023. She has the offer of a lifetime to capture their interest: a "team associated with" real estate mogul Brandon Fugal is interested in their property!

Fugal is famous in ufology for his TV show about the alleged paranormal events at Skinwalker Ranch, which he had purchased from aerospace tycoon Robert Bigelow in 2016.

The team Anjali is referring to is Fugal's spin-off show, Beyond Skinwalker Ranch, executive produced by David Carr. When I told Fugal about Anjali's claims and suggested she had misrepresented David's interest to the property owners, he replied:

"Crazy. I can see David merely conducting due diligence and investigating what may be worth looking into - NOT knowing or understanding the history or personalities."

It would seem Anjali's claim about the team sending her "links and passwords... unavailable to the public" simply refers to a standard response the producers give when the public contacts them about places they might want to investigate for the show.

Anjali has a very specific interest in returning to the property and taking RSO again (which she finally achieved in May 2024). I call bullshit on her claim that "they are very sensitive to your position". I call bullshit on her having had any substantial personalized communication with the producers of the show.

And what communication she may have had, she lied about.

Bryan graciously matches her conciliatory tone and asks whether Fugal's team is interested in filming or purchasing (at the time, he was looking to sell the property).

Anjali replies that the team is interested making an evidence-based filmed investigation. And she makes the outrageous claim that this team associated with Fugal are "willing to ingest substances to reach the beings."

(Fugal is a Mormon. Mormons are forbidden from taking drugs including coffee, alcohol, tobacco, and of course cannabis. This makes Anjali's claim ridiculous on the face of it.)

When I put this to Fugal (including the name "David" which Anjali includes in a later text) in May 2024, he said:

"I appreciate you bringing this to my attention, especially as I would have NOTHING to do with this kind of behavior. David Carr is one of the producers of Beyond Skinwalker and has always operated with professionalism and knows I am very sensitive regarding the integrity of our investigation into these topics."

Fugal even sent me his personal phone number, apparently eager to clear things up in person. (I did not call and I think his TV shows are entertainment masquerading as science, and that Mormonism is a controlling patriarchal cult, but that's not relevant here.)

Back to the texts from August 2023. Anjali assures Bryan that she's been honest with them, which is itself a lie - and she will continue to lie to them over the next few weeks.

Given Bryan's question about whether Fugal's team was interested in purchasing the land, Anjali drops another carrot - reminding them that he's super-rich: "Brandon bought Skinwalker ranch. Millions."

Flashback to 2021

This echoes Anjali's manipulations from 2021, when she tried to make the couple believe that Bigelow Aerospace was interested in purchasing their property. She would name the company as the "interested party" and roped Whitley Strieber into being a liaison for the purchase. (Strieber later denied this.) After Bryan jokingly told her he wanted $10mil (half in cash) for the property, hoping to get rid of her, she told them:

"I do think it is possible to get that much for your property, and possibly more, honestly, given what is inside your mountain. If I remember correctly, Skinwalker Ranch was sold for $2.4m a few years ago."

This was a ruse to get herself back on the property disguised as the necessity to gather evidence to convince a rich buyer. "I will grind myself into the ground to find a buyer for your property", she told them. After getting no response for two weeks (because it was a joke!) she wrote on Oct 16: "Please give me a call. I have really good news!"

And sent them a link to Bigelow Aerospace's website. The clear intent here was to make them believe she had "news" that Bigelow was actively interested.

After a phone call, Bryan wrote on Oct 20 that nobody could come to the property:

"After talking more with our attorney, It is more complicated than we thought. The liability alone is risky. The rest of what we’re hearing is a whole lot of stress we cannot handle at this time.
No one is allowed on our land! We are need quiet space and time to do what I’m facing. By the looks of things, you can use some rest yourself.
Thank you for your understanding. We wish you the best on your alien journey!"

Anjali turned on the pressure, even blaming the beings:

"I did drive 1600 miles to see you, though, and it is the only reason I am even here in California. So I have to continue to try, as the beings have insisted... No decent lawyer would ever tell their client not to verify if their property could be actually be worth $10-20 million more than they currently think it is - especially when it’s free of charge to do so. If your lawyer doesn’t want a chunk of the millions, then you need to find a new lawyer."

Desperate for some peace after weeks-long harassment campaign, Bryan's wife wrote: "We are trying to live our lives peacefully and this has done nothing but cause us emotional distress and severe anxiety. You are making it so much harder to get through this time. If you are truly the kind loving person you say you are, then you will respect this."

It would take Anjali two weeks to publicly announce the expedition was "postponed".

So, Anjali's lies at that time:

She told them Bigelow was interested in buying their property, perhaps for even more than $10mil. False.
She told them Strieber would broker the purchase. False.

And her ploy was repeated in 2023:

A team associated with Fugal (he's rich!) was interested in investigating their property. False.
The team were willing to take drugs. False. And defamatory.

Anjali cuts her losses... for now

In a Twitter Space in Feb 2025, Anjali said the reason the expedition fell through was "because Wayne [Bryan] was asking for an exorbitant amount of money from me."

Anjali has given various reasons for why the expedition didn't happen, but this one in particular is absolutely false. Bryan never asked her for any money. He jokingly set a price of $10mil for someone to purchase the property (not as a payment from Anjali) and he did not follow up on it. Because it was a joke.

This cycle repeated in 2023: After presenting the lure, Anjali wrote two days later to see if Bryan had looked at the links she sent (about the Beyond Skinwalker Ranch show, and note that she names the producer David and calls him "interested").

Bryan then asked for a $10K fee to film for one day. Whether or not Anjali passed along this message, she did not respond until more than 3 weeks later to say she hadn't heard from the team.

You can see from Bryan's response that he did not care.

Then Anjali tells them to watch for Oct 15. She doesn't tell them why. Given the circumstances and their history, this is pure emotionally manipulation designed to make them worry.

Finally, a lavender love heart to make you puke.

Compounding the lies

This episode of lies and attempted manipulation doesn't end there. When I learned about these texts, I wrote to Paul Beban (a presenter on the show) who suggested I write to Fugal. I DM'ed Fugal on Twitter on May 1 but he didn't respond until May 22, as he was traveling. In the end he saw my public tweets before the DMs.

I tweeted about Anjali's texts on May 12 because it seemed ridiculous to me that anyone associated with Brandon Fugal would tell some random lady that they'd take drugs in the course of their investigations for the show.

Fugal of course said it was false.

My first tweet about Anjali's outrageous claim to the property owners, and Fugal's reply (before he saw my DMs)

Did Anjali explain her lie about the team associated with Fugal being willing to ingest substances? Of course not. She called me a liar and denied all knowledge of contact with Fugal's team.

In this first tweet, she asserts I went through her contacts (this is false and irrelevant) and deflects to talk about her podcast producers - people who have nothing to do with her Aug 2023 texts to Bryan that Fugal's team was interested in investigating their property:

Next, Anjali tells Paul Beban she has no idea who he is. Yet she'd told Bryan the Beyond Skinwalker Ranch team wanted to visit and they'd given her access to secret videos... Paul is a presenter on that show! It's bizarre that she now claims she's not familiar with the show:

This third tweet is in response to Fugal's confusion. A week later he saw my earlier DM and we corresponded there. He characterized her claim as "crazy".

Within days of that tweet, Anjali was back at the property with supposed potential buyers. In the kitchen, she told the wife to her face that Charlie Wiser was lying about what she'd said. The wife had Anjali's texts right there on her phone but didn't dispute it at the time, because there was someone else present.

Six weeks later, Anjali replied to a tweet of mine with an attempted explanation: she simply forgot she'd written those texts (those lies) to Bryan 9 months earlier. (Note that her texts to the couple are their property and they have every right to share them with me - and I have every right to publicize them in order to expose her lies and manipulations.)

Yes, Anjali's excuse for lying to Bryan and defaming Fugal's team is that a few months later she would forget she wrote it. No attempt to explain why she lied in the first place. She forgot she lied, therefore she did not lie.

Anjali continued with yet another weird deflection, by again bringing up her podcast producers who have nothing to do with this incident. I don't know who she means by saying I suggested "several reputable producers" but the only producers involved in this story were "David" and Fugal, both of whom she inserted by name into her fantasy, not me. (The other name I used around that time, in relation to her podcast - Josh - was indeed the name of her podcast producer.)

Anjali has been telling hideous lies about me since Feb 2022, threatened twice to sue me (including lying about me to try and manipulate others to join the lawsuit), explained her plan to dox me, and is now supposedly pressing charges against me. All because I've been researching and debunking her silly story and exposing her subsequent lies and manipulations. Instead of admitting to her lies about me and others, showing the slightest degree of self-reflection for those lies, or offering a scrap of evidence, she doubles and triples down and claims she is "honest".

So, I'm not really inclined to "move on".

]]><![CDATA[Higher beings with questionable ethics]]>Sat, 10 May 2025 05:02:53 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/higher-beings-with-questionable-ethics

Before she met aliens, in 2012 Angelia Schultz/Anjali wrote and published a YA fantasy novel The Nameless, planned as the first of a series (she didn't publish any more). Now Anjali says higher beings influenced her writing in the book:

What message these higher beings trying to convey with the following sexual assault scene and aftermath, from chapters 25-26? Because it reads like it's about how to accept abuse because your abuser loves you lots.

NOTE: Anjali has never given instructions on how to learn conscious communication with other humans, which was the beings' most urgent message until she just stopped talking about it. The only two relevant data points are:

1. In 2017 Anjali experienced her first conscious communication when an alien appeared in her room... while she was watching Netflix.

2. Anjali's 2012 novel, supposedly influenced by the beings, features two characters who spontaneously develop telepathy with each other as a result of one sexually assaulting the other and crying until the victim feels so bad he forgives her.

So, these two methods are the only clues we have about how to learn conscious communication with others.

The Australian Copyright Act 1968 provides fair dealing exceptions for the purposes of research, criticism, and review. Extracts belong to the copyright holder.

Trigger warning: Anjali posted a link to the book so you can read the full assault scene. If you can stomach it. The relationship in this scene portrays Satya as a sexually abusive narcissist.

Message from the beings: narcissistic abuse leads to telepathy?

Let's go through it. I've edited the excerpts down to about 2600 words, and described what happens in the parts I didn't include. Non-consensual parts and other highlights are underlined.

Satya, the main character, discovers that by touching hot-guy love-interest Hay’s sword (his actual sword), she can control his will. He immediately tells her to stop. Instead, she plans to take advantage - but no worries, she’ll be careful. She compels him to drop to his knees:

I reached behind me with both hands and grasped the blade, watching for Hay’s reaction. Instantly, he drew a sudden breath and steadied himself on the wall, staring at me bewilderedly.

“Satya Aramais,” he asked, breathless with eyes wide. “What are you doing?”

...Gripping the sword, I ran my fingers along the blade and watched him shudder as I said innocently, “I’m not doing anything… Why do you ask?”

He clenched his jaw and said, “You should stop this right now.”

I slowly shook my head back and forth. I felt strangely empowered, like I could do anything I wanted in that moment. I asked, “Can you make me stop?” and squeezed the sword.

He drew a deep breath and struggled to speak, like he wasn’t sure what to say or if he even could. He held me with his eyes, full of twisting emotions.

“It’s okay, I’ll be careful with you,” I reassured him, and he opened his mouth to say something, but nothing came out. I remembered when I’d held his sword and called him by his name, how he’d seemed… submissive… and obedient. I wondered if it had just been the heat of the moment or if it was something more.

I said quietly, gently, “Haimanutha Achalaa…,” testing my theory.

Hay stepped forward and fell to his knees before me. His eyes swirled with confusion as he looked at me. Straining to speak, he said, “Yes, Satya Aramais…”

She wants to devour him, while he acts confused. She confirms it doesn't hurt him and that he's defenseless.

He tells her to stop. She revels in the power and continues since it’s painless and harmless. He’s helpless and she ignores his desperation:

“But please tell me – why are you doing this? Let me go.”

I saw something in his eyes that called out to me, and I wondered if I should stop. But I felt incredible and it was exhilarating. I craved to know how far I could take it, what I could make him do. I thought of harmless things, wonderful things, things that wouldn’t hurt anyone.

Breathing heavily he whispered a plea, “Speak to me and tell me why you do this.”

I heard him, heard the desperation in his voice, but it seemed so far away and disconnected that it didn’t quite make it through to me. And I didn’t feel quite like myself. I felt empowered and infinite and slightly out of control. Dangerous, even.

Satya blames her “fun” behavior on his hotness and on alcohol, fantasizes about how she's going to abuse him, and concludes he secretly wants it even though he's clearly not consenting:

I shook my head at him – I wasn’t going to explain anything. I felt it was obvious why I was doing it, and he knew why as well. It was exciting and fun, and I could tell there was a part of him that was as exhilarated as I was...

...I breathed deeply and tried to clear my head, wondering if the wine was making me act this way. I was thinking to myself that I just wanted to have a little fun and that it would be harmless. And that I could even get him to undress in front of me, piece by piece, and then I would do the same for him. What harm could there be in that? It’s what we both wanted in the end, wasn’t it? I knew it was the direction this night was taking.

She makes him strip and thinks it's fun. He tells her to stop (7 times verbally, along with many references to his reluctant anguished body language) but she says he likes it and continues over his objections. Everything’s fine because she loves him heaps:

I hesitated, knowing I wasn’t entirely in control of myself. I bit my lip and said, “Haimanutha Achalaa, please take off your shirt.”

His eyes widened in surprise and he looked reluctant even as he lifted the bottom edge of his shirt and pulled it up over his arms and head. Dropping it to the floor beside him, he breathed, “This is far enough… Your point has been made….”

“I’m not making a point,” I told him, smiling, “I’m just having a little fun. And admit it, so are you. So take off your belt as well, Haimanutha.”

He said nothing but watched me anxiously as he unbuckled...

She taunts him with the threat of rape, tells him he’ll love it. He pleads with her to stop. His helplessness thrills her:

...he was a gentleman, and I knew without a doubt that I would love him until my last dying breath.

I thought I could feel something growing in him, something he was trying to control and I could tell he wasn’t sure how much longer he could. It was longing for me all twisted up in aggression and adoration. He was conflicted and trying to hide it. But I saw it. I saw him clearly and wondered how long he’d been struggling with it.

...Feeling bold and daring, I teased, “I could make you do anything right now and it feels as incredible for you as it does for me. I can feel how you’re wondering what you’ll have to do. I see inside you, Haimanutha Achalaa, and I know what you hope I’ll make you do… Things you haven’t the courage to do yourself.”

... [He says] “This is not the way to test it. I beseech you – let me go, Satya Aramais, and I’ll show you what I have the courage to do.”

She considers proceeding consensually but instead continues to enjoy the prospect of assaulting him:

His eyes burned into me and it was thrilling. I’d underestimated him, and I was tempted to let go of the sword and just tackle him right then and there, to let him prove it to me. But something in me didn’t want to let the sword go, it wanted to keep going, it wanted to command him, it wanted to control him a little more. And that something in me was winning.

I shook my head at him again, “Not yet… First, tell me, Haimanutha Achalaa, how long have you loved me?”

His eyes shining, he breathed, “Since the day I first met you, Satya Aramais. Now, please –”

She knows she’s gone too far. Keeps going:

I knew that I had gone too far. And I knew I was going to go farther.

She continues to gleefully plan the assault while forcing him to speak his intimate secrets, humiliating him. He begs her to stop while she assures him she loves him:

...He was afraid of what I’d make him reveal. Or what I may do next. I knew exactly what I was going to do.

...“Yes, Satya Aramais, I wanted you then…. And I am ashamed… Please stop this…”

...Shaking my head, I said, “Don’t be ashamed, please. It’s perfect – you’re perfect. I love you…”

“As I love you,” he breathed, his eyes worried. “But what you’re doing isn’t right…. There’s something wrong…. Will you let me go now?”

I whispered, “Not until you kiss me as you have never kissed another.”

...“Please, stop this.”

Needing his love, I sighed, “Then come to me now, and kiss me, touch me, love me like you never have before.”

Because she loves him, she goes ahead and sexually assaults him by magically compelling him to kiss him (while of course also scaring him into the belief she'll make him do worse).

Groaning loudly, he moved to me in a flash and was on his knees directly before me, leaning against my legs. He pressed his mouth to mine, his warm lips wrapping around my own as he kissed me passionately, completely...

The only reason the assault ends is because she accidentally lets go of the sword, which releases him from the spell. She immediately wishes they could keep going:

The moment I let go of the sword, Hay was on his feet and looming over me, his sword in his hand behind his back. I fell back on the bed and tried to catch my breath, pulling my dress down below my knees.

Breathless himself, he glowered at me and thundered, “What were you thinking?!”

...I was stunned a little, wondering myself what I had been thinking, knowing I really hadn’t been, that I’d been feeling, only feeling, and wanting. And I was lost in the haze of his kiss and touch, wishing he’d come back to me.

He's furious about what he almost did (breaking his oath by having sex with her). She says sorry. He’s in anguish that she violated a sacred trust, and so angry he shatters the stone floor with his sword.

I sat up slowly, suddenly embarrassed. I began trembling from the anger and fear radiating from him. “I’m sorry, Hay…”

...Chest heaving as he pointed with his sword to the destroyed floor, he choked out through tears, “What you made me do right there, what you did to me – ” He stopped and swallowed hard, “You violated a sacred trust between us, Satya Aramais. Don’t you see that? You violated my oath to you. And you forced the most holy thing we can give one another – our bodies – our bodies, Satya Aramais…. You forced me to –” He cut off his words and tears streamed down his face as he looked at me with devastated, sorrowful eyes. “How could you do that to me? To us? To yourself? How could you?”

But Charlie, perhaps this entire scene was meant to teach Satya a lesson about the harmful misuse of power!

Well… no. The scene is about how awful this was for… Satya. She makes excuses for violating him, takes no responsibility, and shows no understanding of his suffering. She cries. A lot. (16 references to her sobbing and wailing coming up.) She wants her burden lifted.

I was crying, seeing the pain in his face and hearing it in his voice. I was full of shame and regret and I couldn’t even explain why I’d done it. I sobbed, shaking my head, unable to find the words he needed. I couldn’t make this go away, I couldn’t make it go away… God, please make it go away…

...Turning away from me, he turned his face up at the ceiling and threw his arms over his eyes. His shoulders shook silently with grief and betrayal.

I wanted to go to him, to hold him and beg him for his forgiveness as I watched him suffer. I cried openly on the bed... [He walks out.]

I disintegrated on the bed, screaming my sobs into the blankets. I was so full of despair, I could barely breathe and I wished death would just come and take me, rid me of all of this and lift the burden my life was on Hay and so many others...

I must have cried myself to sleep...

She feels ashamed, wicked, undeserving, horrible! She's grieving!?! yada yada, Woe is me! She wants God to take away her bad feelings! Cries so much she’s screaming! She wants to die! The memory of the scene is too much for her! For her.

The tears began again, and I just lay and cried. The grief was unbearable as I thought of how he’d asked me to stop and I hadn’t listened... The images were too much for me and I sobbed aloud.

I begged God to take me away and to set Hay free of me. I was my father’s daughter – and my mother’s – I realized, and I loathed myself...

I curled up in a ball and gripped the blankets to my face. I sobbed until I just couldn’t anymore, wishing death would come take me... And please, God, take me away from here, give me death and rid them all of me. Just rid them all of me now. Please, I beg you… give me death...

Her solution to being an abuser: Get her victim fired!

But death didn’t come for me. Not yet. I lay there silently with my face in the blankets, tears burning my swollen eyes. And then it occurred to me – I knew what I had to do. I’d go to the Council and have Hay removed as my guardian.

But Charlie, perhaps the author explores how the victim’s humiliation and devastation help Satya understand the gravity of what she did, leading to her learning some empathy as she considers how her victim can heal.

Well… no. Not that, either…

Guys, Hay is fine! His sexual assault was beneficial! It triggered telepathy between them! He comforts her and wants her to stop feeling bad. She asks for reassurance she's not wicked and makes him acknowledge her love. She'll die if he doesn't forgive her. What message is this sending?

His voice was hoarse, crackly, “I cannot explain, but since – since – since you commanded me – your thoughts have been coming to me clearly. They’re private and I have the sense you don’t intend them for me.” His brow furrowed severely, “They’re terrible thoughts, you must stop this…”

...A sob escaped my lips as I raised my eyes back to his. He said, “To think you know better than he that you should have death and not life... I fear for your soul when you think such a thing... And you are not wicked. You are lost...

I sobbed as I thought I understood what he meant. I choked out, “Do you believe that I love you?”

Silently, he clenched his jaw and looked away from me, nodding slightly with misty eyes.

“Will you ever be able to forgive me for what I’ve done?” I felt like I would die if he said no.

Given the chance to assess what she did, Satya says I dunno, something something fated lovers so it really wasn’t my fault plus this is confusing to me which is kinda your fault for being my guardian:

His voice cracked, “Do you even know what you’ve done?” Sadness spilled from him.

“Honestly, I don’t think I do,” I cried, shaking my head. “But I’m trying, I swear to you I’m trying to understand what’s happening between us, Haimanutha. But I’m failing, I know I am”... Through my tears, I tried to explain...

...I was trembling as I cried and tried to look at him. “And then I have what’s before me now – you. And how I feel for you, the you I know, but it’s all tied up in this twisted mix of need and love and lust and dependency.” There was a look in his eyes that made me cry even harder.

“I mean, I depend on you to keep me alive, and in some ways it’s sick, Haimanutha, and it perverts my feelings for you because it takes the love I have and twists it together with desperation and violence – and it just isn’t right. It isn’t, but I want it so much, I do, I want it just so damn much that I don’t know what to do.” I bent forward, doubled over and buried my hands in my face and sobbed...

Her crying wrecks him. HE'LL DO ANYTHING TO FIX HER EMOTIONAL DISTRESS CAUSED BY HER ABUSING HIM!

“Satya Aramais,” he implored, “your thoughts are wrecking me. Please stop.”

I sobbed even harder, crumbling forward to the floor and gripping his jeans in my fists, burying my face against his legs. I didn’t know how I’d go on without him, how I’d live, how I’d die, how I’d not become my father.

“Stop,” he choked, “please.”

I pleaded, “Don’t leave me, Haimanutha…. I need you – I love you – I’m begging you – don’t leave me – don’t leave me.”

He swiftly bent and lifted me from the floor, wrapping me in his arms. I threw my arms around him, wailing into his shirt.

“Shhh, stop crying now. Enough,” he whispered into my hair. “Nothing changes – I can never leave you. I’ve already told you – I live for you. I should have told you centuries ago – I love you. I will never leave you. I swear, only God himself can take me from you.”

We clung to one another desperately and all I could think was how much I loved him and how I was so afraid of who I was becoming and how it might destroy him along the way.

“Stop,” he whispered, clinging to me even tighter. “I can’t take it.” I tried to stop but I couldn’t. I knew that in some way we didn’t even realize yet, I had ruined what we’d had. There was something pure between us and now it felt shattered, broken.

“No,” he said, pulling me from him... “Stop crying and understand that I will do anything for you.”

He undresses them both and wants sex with his abuser:

Was this really happening?

“Yes,” he said like falling rain upon my lips. “This is really happening. I give you myself, Satya Aramais, all of me.” He kissed me. “There is nothing broken between us. You have my forgiveness. And my love. And my soul. And now, you may have my body.”...

Satya asks him to stop. He does stop. What a guy!

I whispered to him, “Wait. Please, wait. I’m scared.”

...He looked at me intensely, eyes searching mine. He said, “I hear your thoughts and see the fear in your eyes. Forgive me, Satya Aramais.”

He reaffirms he'll never leave her (his abuser), and she falls asleep without the bother of bad dreams. Whew.

“Shhh, stop worrying,” he whispered against my forehead. “Sleep now. Everything will be fine, I promise.”

I closed my eyes and like sweet relief, sleep came quickly and spared me dreams.

Next morning, Satya gets turned on by the thought of abusing Hay last night and then does it all over again: while touching the sword again, she taunts him and compels him to tell her several intimate things including that she’s never been more beautiful than the morning after the night she assaulted him. The scene ends with her persuading him to have sex.

I flushed red with embarrassment as I remembered slicing my finger with the blade. It had been exciting and even sensual when I’d done it. And I’d felt powerful as I’d smeared my blood along it, watching the shock in his eyes as I’d wanted to command him. Even as I was thinking about it, my stomach grew warm and I wanted to pull him to me. I didn’t understand where the impulse had come from at the time, but I did understand how it made me feel and how much I’d liked it...

“We have to do this to put last night behind us...” In an instant, he grabbed my hands and forcefully placed them on the sword. I jumped and squealed from the surprise of it, but gave in and picked it up...

“Tell me what you’re thinking,” I asked, holding the sword delicately.

He breathed, “I was just thinking that you’ve never been more beautiful than you are now. Sitting there in my shirt with my trust in your hands.”

My heart leapt in my chest and I wanted to kiss him. I asked, “If I tell you to kiss me, that means you have to, right?”

His eyes grew worried. “Yes.”

...I held my breath as he spoke, unintentionally tightening my grip on the sword. “Tell me more,” I whispered.

He shuddered and struggled to breathe steadily. He choked out, “And I feel more possessive of you than I’ve ever felt in all our lifetimes. And more violent about maintaining that than ever before…” His voice trailed off before he pleaded with anxious eyes, “Please make this stop now; I don’t want to say more.”

Did I mention our heroine Satya is the most important person in the universe across space and time – God’s most blessed first creation? An immortal being who abuses someone without consequence and is instantly forgiven by her victim:

“God has not damned you, Satya Aramais. You cannot begin to understand his ways, but you must trust them. You are blessed, his most blessed first creation.”

What does it all mean?

Special snowflake fated to save the world is a common YA fantasy trope. Problematic writing on consent is nothing new either. It’s a terrible message to send teenagers, but a lot of YA fiction is irresponsible in this regard.

But why did higher beings think this was a good idea?

Maybe… it wasn’t higher beings guiding the themes behind Angelia Schultz’s novel. Maybe it was her own fantasies about controlling and abusing people, then playing victim, love-bombing, and expecting the abused to come crawling back with words of eternal adoration.

Maybe.

Note I said fantasies. For an author, fiction is fantasy that amuses them enough to want to share it. However, I've spent the last 3.5 years cataloguing ways in which Anjali has acted out some of those fantasies using real people to get what she seems to think she deserves and instigating smear campaigns and threats of lawsuits and doxing when they don't play along.

Anyway. Completing a novel is an awesome achievement. Good luck with your book, Anj! A first-time author (even a liberal middle-aged woman?!) might get the messaging around sexual assault wrong and that’s not unforgivable. But when higher beings are guiding that message… it’s unfathomable.

P.S. Vennie, who said Anjali only thought she met aliens in a tunnel as a cover memory for being assaulted by the property owners, and then after Ryan Gordon exploded they became BFFs and she was going to be interviewed on Anj's podcast but didn't show up, and then they fell out again after Anj accidentally sent her a phone call that made Vennie think she and the property owners were conspiring to fake aliens to make money or something... Vennie loved the book:

]]><![CDATA[Anjali is "not bluffing"*]]>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 01:15:52 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/anjali-is-not-bluffing*Anjali is bluffing.

This is a follow-up to my previous post: Who's the weakest link?

For research on that story (about Anjali's incorrect claim that I contacted her ex-husband in 2021 to call her a nutcase drug addict and a danger to their child, causing him to cancel Christmas), I'd sent messages to her ex-husband and her daughter asking for the roles they'd played, if any. I'd already spoken to the other player in the story, her ex-partner Max. I sent all four of them a link to the blog post when it went up yesterday.

The comment

A day later, Anjali posted a lengthy and self-contradictory comment on an entirely different post of mine (about her press conference). In that comment she publicly exposed the alleged alcoholism of a mutual acquaintance, stating he is "drunk more hours than he is not, and he is not nice when he's drunk." (This person told me last year he was anticipating a smear campaign from Angelia Schultz.)

I deleted the comment and emailed that I'd only approve comments from her that specifically addressed her lies about me, which her comment entirely avoided.

Her reply:

You are violating South Dakota stalking laws. Cease and desist or we will have to see one another in court. Did Max tell you that I am never serious about that? What a foolish thing to say, coming from him.

If you continue your blogs and posts on me, I will pursue a suit for stalking. As you are a dual-citizen, I can sue you in America.

Just cease and desist, please. I beg you. I don’t want to escalate this any further. Stop stalking me, Charlie. I’m not bluffing.

Note 1: Max did tell me last year: "Seriously, anytime Angelia threatens to sue you, you can laugh at it, absolutely laugh, full belly laugh at it".

That she characterizes this as "foolish" strongly implies she is currently suing him. (Although, as per usual, more likely she's merely beating her chest about doing it.)

Note 2: I am not violating South Dakota stalking laws. In 2021 Anjali identified herself as Angelia Schultz and is a public figure in ufology (scroll down on this page to "Anjali wants to be a public figure"). On my website and other platforms, I've presented (with evidence) the contradictions, lies, and illogical nonsense in her own words about (among many other things):

meeting aliens in a mountain
predicting the apocalyptic end of the world
claiming Brandon Fugal's employees wanted to get high to meet her aliens
accusing me of accusing others of assaulting her

Also, I'm not a US citizen and corrected her on this, and excitedly offered to countersue for defamation over the nasty lies she's spread about me (the canceling Christmas thing, the sexual assault thing, and that time I drove someone to suicide).

She responded with the following helpful tip: "you could change your account to your [real] name and I could press charges against you."

Isn't that called shooting oneself in the foot? Like why would I do that?

She again told me that I'm a US citizen. Whatever. Anjali gets her info from the Galactic Council of Light Beings and I think it's time she reconsidered their wisdom. (Lavvy, could you please host an intervention?)

Past events show that Anjali seems to think if she repeats something to herself often enough, it becomes true.

She's also said she can change the past and that she's suffering from timeline shifts.

While I may be an American citizen in another timeline, in this timeline I am not.

Changing the past, timeline shifts... how to avoid accountability in two easy steps

The crux and the core

Anjali's legal threats, which dominate her private communications, are rather less important to me. What matters to me, the crux of it all, is being lied about. Because not only have I not lied about myself or anything else in the ufology space, until I entered this cesspit nobody else had ever lied about me either. Within months of me talking about aliens, two people went out of their way to lie about me after I exposed their false narratives. Ryan Gordon lied about me (to manipulate Anjali and others), and Anjali lied about me (to manipulate the property owners and others).

"I can’t defame an anonymous account", Anjali told me, because she still doesn't get it. While she's hung up on the technical definition of defamation and fantasies of legal recourse, I'm over here pondering what kind of person (a love n' light "thought leader", moreover) invents lies about someone ruining her kid's Christmas and wrongly accusing a man of sexual assault, and then spreads those lies in order to manipulate others?

Who does that?!

Anjali does that, and since those lies are about me, and since she refuses to even discuss them let alone explain and retract them (with abject apologies, please), I'm going to point out those lies and draw conclusions about what kind of person she is. The kind of person who does that, who embraces that unapologetic dishonesty to their very core, is not the kind of person ufology should give a voice to. In my opinion.

As I told her: Liars rarely face accountability in the world of ufology, but maybe one day she'll face accountability within her own soul. Her "service to others" - inventing lies to manipulate others - won't get her closer to transcendence.

Cue: drum roll

Anjali then presented her T&C, including an ultimatum with no deadline and another helpful tip to lawyer up:

Delete your posts and all mentions of me online. If you do not, I will be informing Weebly and 𝕏 and Reddit and Metabunk that you are breaking a stalking law in America. Still looking into the federal online stalking laws. I will definitely let you know as soon as I do.
...
I will state my position one more time: Delete, cease and desist. Otherwise I will take action for stalking. I’m giving you the opportunity before pushing forward.

Perhaps connect with a lawyer for advice before you continue down the road you are currently on.

As a parting shot, Anjali told me to stay out of her inbox... having previously said she'll definitely be dropping into my inbox just as soon as she's found the relevant federal stalking law that a federal prosecutor is absolutely going to be listening to her about when she brings them her case:

"Charlie debunked my story about cave aliens, used my own words to expose my contradictions, and accused me of lying about her when I lied about her! You will now press charges for stalking!!"**

**Not a real quote, but what's left of Anjali except to make fun of her?

]]><![CDATA[Who’s the weakest link? (Spoiler: it’s Anjali)]]>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:12:32 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/whos-the-weakest-link-spoiler-its-anjali

Images used for research, study, criticism, review, parody and satire

This is the tale of a chain with four links, at least one of which is lying.

When it comes to Angelia Schultz (aka Anjali, previously AnjaliTM, Añjali, .:Anjali:., Anjeli, Angeli), lies are par for the course - as I’ve demonstrated on this website. This time, she has three ways to deflect the lie onto others. Will she admit to being the lying link, or blame her ex-husband, her ex-partner, or her own daughter?

I’ve attempted to find out where the lie originated, and this time I’m naming names... because the lie is about me, and it’s a disgusting lie that involves a child.

She’s debunking what now?

Over the past few months on Twitter (though not on her eternally-not-happening website and podcast) Anjali has shifted her focus to debunking.

You heard me correctly. Debunking.

Anjali, who cannot abide anyone debunking her silly story about meeting aliens in a mountain, is eager to apply critical thinking to other people’s dubious stories. (Click images to enlarge.)

2024 tweets: Anjali debunks a photo and Corbells Mojave triangle craft, and gets all skeptical about Disclosure.

2025 tweets: Anjali debunks a UFO with evidence!

2025 tweets: Anjali debunks UFOs by suggesting mundane explanations!

2025 tweets: Anjali debunks again! Lazar is a frontman! That cat pic is AI-generated! Also quantum something and some UFOs are just cool human tech and we should all learn the difference.

Charlie did what now?

I first heard of Anjali a day or two before her press-free press conference (Aug 2021). Her absolute certainty of belief is what interested me, given the evidence-free nonsense coming from her mouth. I began debunking the facts of her case (such as the impossibility of the tunnel she remembered walking through) and the logic of her claims (such as the property owners’ supposed desire for privacy while being okay with an alien-revealing expedition that would make them the most famous people in the world).

And then, after writing about flavor-of-the-month Anjali for a while, I “reached out” to her ex-husband and told him she was a nutcase drug addict and a danger to their son. He panicked and canceled Christmas on the poor kid. Because of this, Anjali decided to track me down to sue me for defamation.

At least, that is what she told the owners of the Mojave property where she had her experience (see text, right). She told them about this awful behavior of mine in August 2023, and they told me about it a few months later – which was the first I’d heard of it.

(I’ve been in touch with the property owners, whom she called “Wayne and Trisha”, since February 2022.)

Anjali's August 2023 text to the property owners, where she lies about me contacting her ex who then canceled Christmas for their son.

But this story used to be... different.

Anjali emailed me in Feb 2022 to say she was filing a John Doe lawsuit to make my website host Weebly reveal my identity. Since I have a free account using an anonymous email, Weebly has no idea who I am and thus I was unconcerned. And when Anjali laughed off this legal threat a few months later, it was clear her purpose had been nothing but a toothless intimidation tactic to make me remove information about her from my website. (Instead, I added heaps more. Everything is sourced back to her own words.)

The following month, Anjali asked the property owners to join her lawsuit to defend their “honor” because I’d been saying they assaulted her back in Jan 2018. (I never said this, never implied it, and have very specifically always said the opposite.)

Read my Twitter thread about this accusation of Anjali's

Finally sick of all her bullshit, “Wayne and Trisha” aka Bryan and his wife contacted me to tell their side of the story: that they did not take her to meet aliens and have no tunnels on their land). What actually happened: they took Rick Simpson oil, she was acting super high, her concerned daughter sent an ambulance, she and Bryan chatted for a few hours through the evening (during which time she never mentioned having just met aliens with him), a friend picked her up, and they never thought about it again until she reconnected with them in mid-2021 and told (did not ask) them that she was bringing a team of scientists to their property, with cameras and an astronaut, to root around for aliens.

That nose keeps growing

Anjali’s lie evolved to suit her purposes.

The initial story (per her emails to a mutual friend, right) was merely that her ex-husband cited information from my website in his affidavit to the judge.

This is further corroborated in an email in Jan 2022 to the same mutual, where she stated:
I have to tell you, I have considered many times just reaching out to her [Charlie] and explaining what her tweets and website are doing to my private life by being used by a vengeful ex-husband [Aaron Schultz] to keep my child away from me. I am sure that she knows the long, torrid history between he and I now*. If it weren't for my son, I would wish I had never met my ex. He ruined my life in 2012 and I have had to struggle against him to recover ever since, and one day perhaps I will have the opportunity to explain how.

*No idea what she was talking about. I had no knowledge of their history, long or torrid or anything else beyond what she has said publicly.

In Anjali's Feb 2022 legal threat to me, which she forwarded to the property owners along with the suggestion they join her lawsuit, she also said nothing about me “reaching out” to her ex.

Only in 2023 did she add the detail about me actively contacting him to inform him she was a nutcase drug addict and a danger to their son.

(I’ve probably called her nutty a few times in tweets, but I’ve never said she was a drug addict or an unfit mother, nor do I have any reason to think she’s either of those things.)

Where did the lie originate? Last year I was told that Anjali's ex-husband told her daughter who told her (and then she told the property owners, who showed me the message). This chain of events was given to me by Max.

Hence, there are four possible perpetrators. Let's dig into it.

From Angelia Schultz's email to a mutual acquaintance (Jan 13, 2022) where she says her ex used my website for info about her in his affidavit. She later twisted this into the claim that I contacted him.

Whose pants are on fire?

Aaron Schultz (the ex-husband)

It is not true that I contacted Aaron Schultz in 2021. He knows this because in the UFO sphere I've only ever used one name, one email, one account per social media platform. I'm already anonymous - I've never used alt or sock accounts. The first time I ever contacted him was in 2024 when I asked him (repeatedly) if he knew why Anjali was saying I contacted him in 2021.

Aaron's email address is in the 2021 and 2024 directory of the Aberdeen Area Chamber of Commerce where he's listed as the contact for the nonprofit organization United Way of Northeastern South Dakota. On their website he is listed as the Executive Director. His photo and bio match Angelia's ex. (They married in 2006.) I'm presenting this info as evidence that I used the correct email address.

Aaron has so far refused to set the record straight in my defense. While I fully understand not wanting to tangle with that woman, he could've simply made a statement of truth on this matter without mentioning her name.

Anjali claims there are court records proving I contacted Aaron. If Aaron told the court I’d contacted him, he lied to the judge. If he told Anjali's daughter that I contacted him, he lied to her.

Note: I very much doubt Aaron Schultz lied to anyone. The evidence shows he read information from my website, which consisted almost entirely of Anjali's own words, causing him to "freak out" (her words) and write an affidavit for the court.

Ambrielle (the daughter)

Next in line as a potential liar is Ambrielle, who allegedly told Anjali that I'd contacted Aaron.

Ambrielle used her real name in the interview with her mother’s blackmailer (see write-up), so I'll use it here. I messaged her on Facebook in Feb 2025 to ask if Aaron told her I'd contacted him. The message was marked as "seen" a few hours later. She did not respond to it, or to my follow-up a week later. Like Aaron, she is not willing to make a statement in my defense. They're both apparently happy to see Anjali’s disgusting lies about how I ruined Christmas stand unchallenged, when they could easily* set the record straight.

In the aforementioned interview Ambrielle came across as a soft-spoken and honest young woman who was unfortunately roped into speaking on camera with her mother’s blackmailer for the purpose of pre-emptively dousing Anjali’s latest PR crisis. It's hard to ascribe malice to her but the fact remains that she’s a link in this chain. It’s possible she invented a story that I told Aaron those nasty things about her mom, although I can’t imagine a motivation.

*Yes, I know it's not easy dealing with a narcissist. I have nothing but sympathy for Ambrielle on that count, but all I asked was for her to extract herself from this story, if indeed she was not a link in this chain.

Note: I very much doubt Ambrielle lied to anyone. She appears to have been scapegoated into the role of go-between to make the story work, since Anjali and Aaron were not on speaking terms.

Angelia Schultz (Anjali)

The next link in the chain is Anjali herself, who has lied repeatedly and maliciously about me – not to mention about her own life and experiences, as I’ve recorded in her own words for 3+ years. The second-worst lie she told about me is that I publicly expressed the opinion that her hosts had sexually assaulted her in 2018. (I'm ranking it lower than "canceling Christmas which made a kid cry" only because the latter involves actively contacting her family, while the former was just an opinion I expressed. Again, neither of which I actually did.)

Max told me this originated with a graphic posted on Reddit depicting her having an orgy with aliens in a cave, which he and Anjali decided was drawn in my style. This “orgy” picture turned into the claim I said she was “assaulted”, and so she invited her hosts to join her libel lawsuit against me. Instead, they contacted me and blew up Anjali's story.

UPDATE Apr 18: Anjali wrote in a comment (which I deleted) on a different post: "Your details from Max are never correct." If this is true, Max is incorrect that Aaron told Ambrielle that I contacted him. This removes Ambrielle from the chain, leaving the following options: Aaron allegedly committed perjury (seems unlikely to me) or Anjali fabricated the whole thing (seems highly likely to me).

I didn’t post such a graphic, have never created such a graphic, have never suggested or even hinted that Anjali was assaulted in any manner, and have always said that I didn’t believe anything like that happened.

I mention this previous lie of Anjali’s to demonstrate how she not only lies to slander someone who debunked her fantasy about purple mantids, but attempts to manipulate others based on those lies.

Note: I find it highly likely that Anjali lied in 2023 in her text to the property owners (as well as to her partner Max) that I “reached out” to her child’s father to tell him nasty things about her. She just made it up. Her motivation, as before, was to turn them against me, and once again she failed. My relationship with the property owners has always been friendly and honest as they told their story, we shared our perspectives, and together we tried to figure out what was going on.

Adam McLean (aka Max, the ex-partner)

We come to the final link in the chain. During the height of Anjali’s UFOlogy fame she lived in South Dakota with her then-partner Adam McLean. He used the alias Max, which I’ll use here to reduce the number of A-names in this sorry tale.

Last year I asked Max what he knew about the story that I'd contacted Aaron Schultz. More generally, he gave his perspective on many aspects of Anjali’s story. His opinion is that she lives in a narcissism-induced fantasyland, and that she has lied to him (as well as to everyone else), to perpetuate this fantasy.

Read my Twitter thread on why Max considers himself a victim of Anjali's narcissistic abuse

Max sells nutrient supplements for people and horses on various websites including this one. I communicated with him via his personal Facebook page.

Max recalled that Anjali heard the story from her daughter Ambrielle, who heard it from the source - her stepfather Aaron Schultz.

Note: Max could have been lying or misremembering when he told me last year that Anjali heard from her daughter, who was told by Aaron, that I contacted Aaron in 2021. It seems more likely that Anjali lied to him.

In summary, given I never contacted Aaron Schultz in any manner (until 2024), at least one of the following must be true (allegedly):

Aaron Schultz lied to the court and perhaps to Ambrielle.
Ambrielle lied to her mother.
Angelia Schultz/Anjali lied to Max/Adam and to the property owners.
Max lied to me about the above chain of events.

I welcome any statements from these four people that help clarify things.

Once more, to make it abundantly clear to everyone: Anjali’s claims that I contacted her ex in 2021, and that I said her hosts assaulted her, are baseless disgusting lies that Anjali has maliciously spread around and doubled-down on. As Max said, she lives in a fantasy of her own making. Facts do not change her mind. If she wants it to be true, it’s true. Conveniently, she doesn't even have to take responsibility for her lies because, you see, she keeps switching timelines:

"I've experienced what The Council of NHI Beings tells me are 'Timeline Shifts' in which I move from one timeline to another. Near Death Experiences NDEs & Intentions cause one's localized experience to move to similar nonidentical timelines."

(Yes, she fucking said that! So, even if I didn't contact Aaron Schultz in this timeline, I guess maybe I did in some other timeline that I'm unaware of?)

My actual crime, of course, was to debunk her. Debunking others, you will recall, is Anjali’s latest hobby.

Further reading
Read my other blog posts about Anjali

Follow up
Anjali is "not bluffing" (Anjali responds) (with legal threats of course)

]]><![CDATA[Calvine UFO: Do you believe in magic?]]>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 06:06:39 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/calvine-ufo-do-you-believe-in-magic

Photo of a reportedly magical craft, Calvine 1990. (c) Kevin Russell

The Calvine UFO made a comeback in 2022. It is, according to UK academic David Clarke, "the best image of an unidentified flying object ever taken" - an unsurprising opinion from the man who tracked down the photo 32 years after it was taken.

Before he became a part of the story he was investigating, Clarke found no good evidence the craft was real (alien or otherwise) and preferred the conclusion that it was a hoax.

Now he promotes the mystery of the photograph as a high-tech black project craft hovering over the Scottish moors in full view of two hapless hikers (but no one else) taking a break from their menial hotel jobs. He hasn't explained why his previous analysis was wrong. And he not only ridicules skeptical theories but misrepresents them.

The way Clarke has been dishonestly reporting on one aspect of this story in particular, for no apparent reason other than to mislead, leads me to conclude that he believes the photo is a hoax - specifically, that it is a 3D star ornament, a theory first proposed by Wim van Utrecht.

His accomplice in this deception is Andrew Robinson, the photography expert who analyzed the Calvine UFO. Robinson has softened his stance to include the possibility of a hoax, but can't come right out and say it's a model without undermining his "expert" analysis.

Are you blind?

In this June 2024 article on the case, Clarke discusses his preferred theory, that the Calvine UFO is a black project craft:

"Several RAF and MoD personnel have contacted us to say they saw the photograph/s during the 1990s or were involved in the analysis of the images. Their impression was the image was undoubtedly genuine and it showed either the F117A Stealth fighter or a secret prototype operated by the US or UK."

He then spends seven paragraphs talking about the Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk and similar experimental craft, with a picture of their silhouettes compared to Calvine.

As anyone can plainly see, the profiles of these craft don't match the Calvine UFO, not to mention the Calvine UFO photo depicts a featureless grainy object and not a plane.

(Note that Robinson modified the Calvine craft silhouette, adding bumps to the hull and squaring off the bobble on the end. Because god forbid you start thinking it's the bead at the top of a Christmas star.)

As to whether the UFO is some other secret craft, nowhere in Clarke's article does he include the pertinent witness testimony that it hovered for 10 minutes then shot vertically upward at high speed. In other words, it defied gravity (with no visible means of propulsion!). Humans do not possess this technology now, and did not possess it in 1990.

Any plausible theory that assumes the witness testimony as true must include an explanation of the craft's magical behavior. Clarke simply omits that testimony. He is not serious about the black project theory.

Original witness testimony transcribed by MoD, describing the alleged craft's movements. If the witnesses are lying about that, nothing else they say is trustworthy.

Strawman Star

Clarke has written a little about the skeptical theories for the Calvine UFO - a mountain peak in fog, a rock reflection, and a 3D star.

The first clue that Clarke has no intention of talking about any debunks in good faith is his claim that logically, these three skeptical theories can't all simultaneously be true. He trots this out to ridicule the skeptical angle, as if it's a good argument for none for them being true. Nobody has ever claimed all three theories are simultaneously true. For an academic to use this strawman is confounding.

Clarke presents the strawman that somewhere out there is someone saying that three contradictory theories are simultaneously true.

The skeptical theory I consider most plausible is the 3D star, so I'll set aside the other two.

A second indication of Clarke's bad faith approach to the star theory is that he misrepresents it to encourage ridicule. His article includes this photo from a 2023 talk where he waved a 60cm patterned paper star lampshade from a fishing rod: "we tried to reproduce the hoax".

Well, you're not trying very hard, David.

This demo bears no resemblance to van Utrecht's theory - a small glittery star hung motionless from a wire and shot at a specific angle to present a diamond-shaped profile. The faces of the audience tell us that Clarke successfully put the idea into their heads that the theory (as invented by him) can be dismissed as laughable.

Clarke dangles a 60cm paper lampshade from a fishing rod, supposedly to demonstrate how the Calvine photo could have been hoaxed, except that nobody is claiming it was hoaxed this way. (c) David Clarke

Similarly, in his Oct 2024 article about whether the UFO could be a model, Andrew Robinson photographed the same star. For a photography expert, it's unfathomable that he couldn't set up his demo using scenery and lighting conditions that matched the Calvine photo. It's almost like he wants us to dismiss the theory because the original photo can't be replicated with any accuracy.

Andrew Robinson's test photo of the 60cm paper lampshade

60cm Paper Star Lampshade from Amazon UK similar to the one used by Clarke in his demo

Except that it can.

Compare those bad faith recreations to van Utrecht's recreation which accurately illustrates his own theory that Clarke and Robinson claim to be discussing. The only reason to throw around pathetic strawman demonstrations instead of the actual mock-up by the actual person who presented the theory is to deflect and deceive.

The deceptive reframing of the 3D star theory doesn't stop there. In this earlier article from March 2023, Clarke calls van Utrecht's theory "carefully argued" but dismisses it because one of the photos (so far unearthed) allegedly shows a second Harrier jet, which is one jet too many for a couple of pranksters and a fishing rod. Clarke doesn't bother with the idea that the star is a model but the jets are real (even though Robinson does). If van Utrecht is wrong about the jets, he seems to be arguing, he must be wrong about the star, ergo a giant magical craft is more likely.

In the 2024 article he makes this statement about the set-up required if models were used:

“Ingenious but if true this would not be the first UFO image faked by suspending small object from a thin wire.”

I assume he means "Ingenious, although if true..." to indicate this is a common way to fake UFO images. Hardly an effective debunk of the model-on-a-string theory. But that's all he's got.

Enter the Expert

Clarke cites Andrew Robinson's thoughts on the skeptical hoax explanations: "many of these suggestions are simply implausible. Even those that might be plausible create more problems than they solve. The simplest explanation, that we are seeing a photograph of a real object in the sky, is by far the most convincing."

Yes, Robinson believes, or pretends to believe, that a giant hovering gravity-defying diamond-shaped craft with no visible means of propulsion that nobody else saw at the time and that has never reappeared or anything like it in three decades, is a more convincing theory than a couple of lads hoaxing a photo with a model.

But let's look again at that statement. In his own article from Oct 2024, Robinson calls the 3D star theory "one of the most credible" non-UFO explanations. But, by his statement above, that means it's one of the plausible theories that "create more problems than they solve".

So what are these problems created by the 3D star theory? Robinson doesn't say. Instead, his article gives a decent summary of the theory (albeit with the stupid recreation photo) and includes the possibility that the jets are real while the star is a model (which Clarke doesn't like to talk about). Robinson's main objection to it being a model is "there is no evidence that this is actually the case."

Andrew, the evidence is that it looks exactly like a 3D Christmas star. Duh.

Now show me evidence that the US or UK military or any military or anyone on planet Earth had gravity-defying technology in 1990. I'll wait.

Features of the Calvine UFO that match a 3D star: dimensions, shape including bead (on van Utrecht's model), uneven glittery surface, and outline/point of the forward-facing arm.

Robinson has another objection that, again, is bizarre coming from a photographer: it would be hard to take six photos of a hanging object in the same place. Because... tripods weren't invented yet?

"I’d question how easy it would be to construct a total of six convincing consecutive faked images in this manner. … the images are on continuous frames of the film and show the unidentified object in more or less the same place and position in each frame with the plane circling around it and even a second plane visible in some images. This would be very hard to achieve using a hanging model on an open hillside – but clearly not impossible."

He doesn't say why this would be hard to achieve. Instead, he then describes exactly how it could be achieved:

"Harriers and other jets made regular sorties in the area surrounding Calvine. If the photographers were indeed intending to fake a picture of a model UFO, they could have set up their camera and model and waited, hoping to catch a jet flying past on a day when flights might be expected."

Sounds pretty easy to me. And of course we don't know how many times these hoaxers went out to hang their star before they got the money shot. Nor do we know what date the images were taken in order to determine what planes were flying at the time. (Nor, for that matter, do we know the actual location.)

Robinson offers no counterargument to his proposal (which I personally find extremely plausible and have written about).

Robinson is in a bit of a bind, I get that. Before van Utrecht came out with his theory, Robinson had already done his analysis for Clarke and released his report, which concluded the object was large and distant. He'd have to contradict his own "expertise" in order to embrace the model theory that I sincerely feel he so desperately wants to do.

In fact, he already contradicted himself: in that most recent article he doesn't explain how a small close model can be "credible" given he expertly calculated it to be 30 meters long.

Christmas Crisis

Clarke and Robinson are evidently not acting in good faith when it comes to the Calvine UFO photo. Robinson claims the model theory is credible but also that the object is large and distant, and fails to provide any counterargument to the "star model plus real jets" theory.

And Clarke falls back on "I'm just a storyteller!" while failing to properly confront a plausible hoax theory, except to misrepresent it for laughs.

"What I also know - as a folklorist - is that charting the evolution of the story and the continuing reactions to it, from a spectrum of skeptics and believers, is proving far more interesting and insightful than the true or false status of the photograph itself."

If they genuinely doubt the photo is a star, they wouldn't need to misrepresent the theory. And honestly, I don't think either of them is dumb enough to believe in the magic of anti-gravity.

Clarke and Robinson think the Calvine UFO is a 3D Christmas star. I'm certain of it.

Copyrighted material is reproduced for research, study, criticism, review, parody and satire under The Copyright Act 1968 fair dealing exception to copyright infringement.

]]><![CDATA[Anjali's Big Lie (wait, another one?!)]]>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:19:49 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/anjalis-big-lie-wait-another-oneAnjali (Angelia Schultz) is so desperate to convince you that she's important enough for the US government to be interested in her alien experiences, she's retconning her story to make that claim "true".

You didn't notice? The particular lie I'll be exposing here was three-and-a-half years in the making.

It's important to understand that the owners of the property where Anjali had her 2018 experience (healed by a giant lavender mantis in a white misty light, remember?) have never had anyone else from the government or otherwise visiting their property looking for aliens.

Nobody has even contacted them about it, other than this unfortunate fan who texted them a few times in 2021, and whom Anjali put on her expedition team. She then abused him for asking questions after the property owner came forward to dispute her account (fucked-up high-as-a-kite, daughter sent ambulance for welfare check, remember?).

Yes, the USG is so disinterested in Anjali's delusion they haven't even done the most basic fact-checking by talking to or visiting the owners of the property.

They are not interested in Anjali's tale.

Anjali can't abide this. She needs to believe she's a mouthpiece for higher beings! A hybrid from Orion! Destined to help humanity awaken in time for the coming apocalypse and Earth's shift to a higher density! So important to Disclosure that all the important people are aware of her, believe her, and whisper about her behind closed doors because it's all just too sensitive to put on the computer!

So, Anjali rewrites history.

It starts with "Steve" from the CIA who became enamored of her story, spoke to her personally, and then called the UAP Task Force (in 2021). To catch the all-important attention of the authorities, Anjali passed along a prediction from her aliens (that a US adversary would do something "unmistakeable" in a specific location, within 30 days) but this didn't come to pass. Because her bananas story came with no evidence, nothing happened as a result of the UAPTF learning of Anjali's tunnel aliens... except that Steve was sent to psych, refused to lose faith in her, and lost his job 6 months later after a delusional break in 2022.

Sidebar: Let's not forget that Anjali almost caused Steve's death after that mental health episode, when she told him not to go to hospital in the midst of his delusion, even though he was right at the door, so instead he spent two nights outside in the freezing cold with serious undiagnosed illnesses.

To justify the apparent lack of USG interest in her story, Anjali implied it was because it was too sensitive to be written down. Except that Steve did write it down - in a follow-up email to Jay Stratton (former head of UAPTF). Via reporter Tim McMillan, Stratton confirmed no one from UAPTF ever interviewed Anjali. This contradicted Anjali's own words, so she backtracked and explained it was done unofficially (by Steve and two colleagues). Just another example of Anjali bolstering her importance by misleading you. That time, she was caught out.

Note how this echo chamber works: Former members of the intel community (including Steve, Anjali, John Ramirez) bolster each others' narratives by referring to each other as unnamed sources and contacts. This gives the impression the USG is officially interested, when in fact these are simply UFO fans with a USG work history speculating about aliens on their own time.

Clearly the UAPTF and USG are not in fact interested in Anjali's experience of meeting aliens in a tunnel, but Anjali needs you to believe that they are. So, she is now outright lying about it. Here's how her latest lie, years in the making, unfolded:

A week after her Aug 2021 presser, Anjali told Jimmy Church on Fade to Black that nobody in government had contacted her about her experience, either officially or unofficially:

JC: You were a part of the DIA. Has anybody from your past contacted you recently about this? Official or in any way?

Anjali: Through official means?

JC: In any way.

A: No.

JC: Are they aware of what is going on?

A: Um, I would think they’re pretty aware, yes.

JC: Okay, but in an official sense, you haven't been contacted?

A: That's right.

JC: Okay.

A: Isn’t that interesting? Can we talk about that?

Over a year later, during her GaiaTV appearance in Nov 2022, Richard Doty informed a clearly surprised Anjali that the two "reporters" who talked to her at the presser were actually intelligence officers. (The episodes are paywalled but I tweeted about the exchange here.)

From her reaction it was clear Anjali did not know this until that moment. (Doty was probably making it up anyway, and indeed he got it wrong by claiming they were more interested in the land owner, which contradicted her narrative.) But it seems Anjali took it on board and from that moment decided the US government had been undercover at her presser.

Okay, great. But this week Anjali forgot all about what she told Church and what Doty told her. On Feb 12 she tweeted that these two people identified themselves at her presser as "an FBI SA and a DIA Officer". Recall she told Church, specifically, that nobody from DIA contacted her after the presser. Recall she told Doty (off-camera) about the two reporters, and he informed her - a year after her presser - they were undercover intel officers.

Anjali is rewriting history and saying she knew all along that government reps were present because these officers introduced themselves right there. She is even using this as the reason she didn't feel the need to make an official report - their presence was sufficient.

Note that while Anjali said at the time the presser was to attract the attention of scientists for her expedition, and that indeed is what she talked about, she retconned its purpose later and said it was to catch the attention of the appropriate people in DC. So, why on earth didn't she take down the names of these intel officers who'd expressed interest, and stay in touch? Wasn't that the entire point of the presser?

Sidebar: Even if we parse Anjali's tweet to mean the couple identified themselves by name but not as intel officers (which explains her surprise when Doty informed her they were undercover), fifteen months elapsed between her presser and finding out they were intel officers. What, then, was her reason for not filing an official report during that time?

Regardless, Anjali clearly wants to give you the impression she knew at the time that intel officers spoke to her at the presser.

Anjali's narcissism means she not only cannot be mistaken about her 2018 experience or her recovered memories about lifelong contact with NHI. It also results in her placing herself at the center of a heroic narrative: she is a mouthpiece for higher beings, she chose the mission to be born on Earth and speak for higher beings (though she's consistently confused about what they say, and what they say has been proven wrong), and she is a person of interest to the US government because she was brave enough to come forward with her evidence-free story about meeting aliens in a tunnel.

The non-delusional interpretation of what happened here?

A couple of reporters talked briefly to Anjali at her presser. She found it "interesting" that nobody official contacted her as a result of the story she told at the presser. After the expedition failed and she became enmeshed in the Disclosure echo chamber, she reconned the purpose of the presser. Doty boosted her ego by stating those reporters were actually intel officers. Anjali's fantasy-prone personality enabled her to rewrite history, contradictions be damned, so that she now claims the intel officers introduced themselves at the presser, thus confirming her narcissistic need to be important to the USG.

Sidebar: There is no evidence for Anjali's NHI other than her reports of what they say, and the evidence shows that what they say is wrong:

There is no tunnel of aliens.
She was not healed in their white light (she later admitted it was probably the cannabis that made her feel better afterwards, and a few years later was diagnosed with cancer).
Their message about microbes being released from the permafrost was just a 2-year-old Nature article that Anjali ascribed to their wisdom.
Their predicted world event did not come true.

In a Jan 2025 X Space hosted by Anjali, when asked if the beings had told her anything that came true, the best she could come up with was that they warned her she wouldn't find them when she returned to the property in 2024. She went anyway, dragging along her haplessly conned autistic podcast producer Josh Isaacson from Savant Entertainment, and whaddya know - the tunnel that was never there in the first place... was not there!

I've catalogued dozens of instances of Anjali lying - about herself and others - and misrepresenting the truth in order to bolster her story, including rewriting history. It matters because this is a woman who reels in vulnerable people desperate to believe, people without the ability to recognize narcissism or to rationally assess her claims, and certainly without the knowledge of her history that would enable them to spot her deceptions.

]]><![CDATA[Fake messenger of love, light, & lies]]>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 22:08:03 GMThttps://threedollarkit.weebly.com/blog/fake-messenger-of-love-light-lies

"Fake it 'til you make it"
~ Anjali

On this the 7th anniversary of Anjali (Angelia Schultz) entering a tunnel on a Mojave property to meet NHI beings, including a giant lavender mantis who healed her in a mist of white light, let's look at just a few of the lies and manipulations she's indulged in to bolster her fake reputation as a "thought leader" in the UFO community after her March 2021 story about meeting aliens in a tunnel quickly fell apart.

Fake notes

Anjali wrote in her Mar 2021 Reddit post that this was the first time she'd written down her story. In a comment on that post she said she wrote it down at the time. In an Apr 2022 YouTube comment she said she'd woken up the next morning and forgotten what happened. But back in Nov 2021 she unearthed notes detailing the events of the day that she claimed she'd written the next afternoon [Link]. I proved those notes were fake and written in 2021, not 2018.

Fake sobriety

Anjali repeatedly answered questions about drug use on Tunnel Day by saying she'd taken no drugs, there were no drugs in her system. This was critically important for her credibility and her claim to have perfect recall of events (after having forgotten and re-remembered many times over the years, she says). Two days after the property owner Bryan told her in Nov 2021 he'd reveal she'd been "high as as kite", Anjali admitted to taking "medical cannabis" on her California Rx card, but implied it had no effect on her mental faculties. This was all false. Anjali was given extremely potent Rick Simpson oil by Bryan, who used it as part of his own healing. Three witnesses describe Anjali's behavior that day as confused and "fucked up". She admitted in 2024 that she doesn't have a full accounting of the day, after previously insisting she did. Had she told the truth in Mar 2021 about taking Rick Simpson oil for the first time before the events of Tunnel Day, no one would have taken her seriously and she'd have been laughed out of ufology. So, she lied.
An additional lie regarding cannabis occurred in her Oct 2024 interview when Anjali said: "I was always clear that I had cannabis in my system". Previously in March 2022 she repeated that she took cannabis oil "which I have stated all along". Anjali is infamous for rewriting history, and here she goes again. For 8 months following her initial Reddit post in Mar 2021, Anjali never once mentioned having cannabis in her system and denied outright any drug use that day. Only after she was forced to admit to "medical cannabis" did we know about it. And since then, Anjali has maintained that the drug had no impact whatsoever on her perception or memories, despite evidence to the contrary (including witness testimony and her false recollection that the ambulance arrived 5 hours earlier than she thought).

Fake hero

During the month when the property owners ghosted Anjali after the press conference, she texted them multiple times. This included her plan to spread false details about them, to ensure people wouldn't find them. She tweeted a thread about "Wayne" (her name for Bryan) being rich and having armed guards, and told Bryan that "it worked" because Steven Cambian (Truthseekers) "took the bait" and had found the wrong person. This was all false, and designed to manipulate Bryan and his wife into thinking she'd come up with a clever scheme to keep them safe. The timeline was the opposite of what she told them: before she texted Bryan about it or wrote the tweets, Cambian had already told her about the "Wayne" candidate who had been found. Additionally, in a 2024 interview Anjali said she did this because Bryan was being harassed by people looking for the tunnel. Another lie. Nobody knew of Bryan's existence back then (Sep 2021). Nobody was harassing him. Nobody ever harassed him (except for Anjali, of course).

Fake representation

In Feb 2022 Anjali told the property owners that Bigelow Aerospace was the "interested party" in purchasing their property the previous October. She named Whitley Strieber as a liaison in the purchase. This was all false. Bigelow was not an interested party - their interest was a figment of Anjali's imagination. Strieber denied being a liaison.

Fake smears

In Feb 2022 when Anjali learned that Bryan and his wife had come forward to me (Charlie Wiser), she expressed dismay in a message to them and presented a barrage of lies about me to try and manipulate them into joining her libel lawsuit against me. The lies included: that I had suggested they drugged, raped, and filmed her, that someone paid them to cancel the expedition, that Bryan did not have cancer, that I worked with "porn producer Ryan Gordon" to find "Wayne", and that Anjali had made everything up. The first of these accusations is particularly libelous against me, and Anjali has never provided any evidence for it. (I'd repeatedly said the opposite when anyone else suggested it: that I didn't think her experience had been negative or that her hosts did anything nefarious.) In 2024 I spoke to her then-partner Max, who explained someone once posted a graphic on Reddit implying Anjali had an orgy in the tunnel. He later could not find the graphic or any conversation around it. While I've never made or posted such a graphic, it's plausible someone else did. Regardless, Anjali pinned it on me and then morphed it into the accusation that I accused her hosts of rape. (I have no alts in the ufology space. Anything anyone has ever said or posted that was not from my known Charlie Wiser social media accounts or email was not me.) Note that the first people to wonder if Anjali had been sexually assaulted were her friend who picked her up that night and her daughter. Anjali herself in Aug 2021 (on Jimmy Church's Fade To Black) made a joke wondering if she was about to be the victim of a snuff film:

Q: You must've been relieved it was ET and not a torture chamber for the end of your life, right?
A: Like some kind of snuff film or something? Yeah. I was incredibly relieved.

Fake victimhood

When Anjali reconnected with her hosts in Aug 2023 she attempted to manipulate them by telling them I contacted her ex in 2021 calling her a nutcase drug addict and a danger to their son. This caused him to panic and cancel their son's visitation over Christmas. This is completely untrue. I have never contacted her ex, except for three times in April 2024 when I asked him why Anjali was saying I had. Anjali has never provided any evidence. Back in Jan 2022 when she told me she was going to ask a judge to make Weebly uncover my identity in order to sue me, she said my website was named in an affidavit - presumably that of her ex. If the affidavit says I contacted him, he lied in a sworn statement to the court. Otherwise, it's Anjali who is - once again - lying.

Fake Fugal

Anjali made bizarre false statements to Bryan and his wife when she reconnected with them in Aug 2023. She said Brandon Fugal's Beyond Skinwalker Ranch team were interested in coming to the property for "in-person investigations", and were "willing to get ingest substances to reach the beings." Anjali publicly said I was lying when I tweeted about it 9 months later, saying this was the first she'd heard of any team associated with Fugal and herself. When I posted the screenshots, she never explained the libelous lie about Fugal's team or acknowledged I wasn't lying, but simply said she forgot she wrote that text. If she forgot what she wrote, she never wrote it, I guess? Brandon Fugal categorically denied that his people would ever say that.

Who needs evidence?

It's important to reiterate that Anjali has not provided one scrap of evidence that she met aliens in a tunnel on Jan 21, 2018.

Bryan denies having the skills or resources to dig the impossible tunnel that Anjali describes, and denies telling her a story of digging a tunnel, meeting aliens inside it, or inviting her home to meet his aliens.
Three other witnesses present deny taking Anjali to meet aliens in a tunnel. They say she was high and acting weird. (In fact she was so high that her daughter became worried enough to send an ambulance for welfare check.)
There is no tunnel.
The confirmed ambulance call time, along with the small alcove she remembers as a tunnel entrance, prove Anjali has distorted memories and perceptions of the day (because she was high).
Anjali has no contemporaneous notes or witnesses to bolster her story.
Anjali's story has changed as her memories become distorted. She now claims she first came into contact with NHI from "the Council" in Nov 2017, whereas she initially said mid-Dec. She changed her lavender mantis's gender from female to male and back to female (a remarkable confusion given the close relationship she claims to have with Lavvy over many years).
Anjali's social media from Nov 2017 thru Jan 2018 shows no indication that she'd just experiences that in retrospect she describes as life-changing (three visits from holographic Lavvy along with meeting her/him in person on Tunnel Day). Two days after Tunnel Day, she was posting on Facebook about her hot date (a man engaged to someone else, with whom she planned a camping trip) and her bangs. Despite claiming her worldview expanded and she became no longer interested in worldly things, she continued posting about worldly things as if nothing had changed. This all indicates that the entire "memory" of the tunnel was created in her imagination years later, which Anjali has even admitted to (she says she only reliably remembered it in 2020).

Narcissistic nonsense

The story that Anjali fabricated (using false memories and conscious lies), and with which she dived into the UFO community with a splash, centered herself as the soon-to-be most important person in history. She insisted she would provide evidence by the end of 2021 and that she would question her reality with the help of a shaman if she failed.

She did fail, but her false reality remains.

As an aside: Angelia Schultz's 2012 YA novel The Nameless includes a narcissistic sexual assault scene by a woman on a man rendered helpless. Anjali claims the beings influenced her book.

It's been proven beyond doubt that Anjali never met aliens in a tunnel that day, she never entered a tunnel at all, and there is no tunnel. It was all just a product of her overactive imagination fueled by cannabis-induced memory holes and narcissistic fantasy.

Several people in the community have been subjected to her narcissism, her legal threats, and her doxing attempts. Her ex-partner Max considers himself a victim of her narcissistic abuse.

But because the community thrives on belief-without-evidence, and because the community is susceptible to the sweet voices of former DoD employees spouting messages of love and quantum nonsense, Anjali's standing remains intact among the gullible.

This is despite her smear campaigns based on lies, threats to sue people who dare question her narrative, manipulations of various people within and outside the community including her autistic podcast producer, and abusive, intimidating behavior toward Bryan and his wife, over a period of years, while they were dealing with cancer.

Anjali claims to be an advanced consciousness from Orion jammed into faulty third-density human biotech garbled and contradictory nonsense, please remember:

Nobody speaks for higher beings. They can speak for themselves.

]]>